Read each question scenario and the statements below it. Click on the ONE statement/step you believe is INCORRECT. The explanation for why the indicated answer is incorrect will appear after you click any option.
Score: 0
Question 1(a)(i): Describing Appearance After Sedimentation
Test tube R initially contains a uniform suspension of yeast cells. After being left undisturbed for some time, sedimentation occurs, resulting in the appearance observed in test tube S. Which statement below incorrectly describes the appearance of test tube S?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- The mixture in the tube separates into visibly distinct upper and lower regions.
- A clear or clearer liquid layer, called the supernatant, is visible.
- A packed layer of yeast cells, called the sediment, forms.
- The clear supernatant layer is located at the bottom of the test tube.
- The sediment layer, composed of settled yeast cells, is found at the bottom of the tube.
Reason Incorrect (D): Statement (D) incorrectly locates the supernatant. Sedimentation causes the denser yeast cells to settle to the bottom due to gravity, forming the sediment (correctly described in E). The less dense liquid medium, the supernatant, remains above the sediment layer (i.e., at the top portion of the liquid). (A), (B), and (C) also correctly describe the appearance.
Question 1(a)(ii): Preparing Ethanol Dilutions
You need to prepare 10 cm³ of a 40% ethanol solution using a 100% ethanol stock solution (E) and distilled water (W) via proportional dilution. Which step below describes an incorrect calculation or procedure for this specific task?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- Identify the total final volume required for the dilution, which is 10 cm³.
- Calculate the volume of 100% ethanol (E) needed: 40% of 10 cm³ = (40/100) * 10 cm³ = 4.0 cm³.
- Calculate the volume of distilled water (W) needed by subtracting the required ethanol volume from the total volume: 10 cm³ – 4.0 cm³ = 6.0 cm³.
- Accurately measure 4.0 cm³ of distilled water (W) using a suitable measuring cylinder or pipette.
- Accurately measure 6.0 cm³ of distilled water (W) separately, then combine the measured 4.0 cm³ of ethanol (E) and 6.0 cm³ of water (W) and mix thoroughly.
Reason Incorrect (D): Statement (D) describes measuring the wrong substance for that specific volume. The calculation in (B) correctly determined that 4.0 cm³ of 100% ethanol (E) is needed. Step (D) incorrectly states to measure 4.0 cm³ of distilled water (W). Step (E) correctly describes measuring the required water volume (6.0 cm³) and combining it with the correct ethanol volume (4.0 cm³ from step B).
Question 1(a)(iii): Setting Up the Results Table
You are investigating the effect of various ethanol concentrations (including a 0% control) on the height of yeast sediment (measured in mm) over 20 minutes, with readings taken every 4 minutes. Which step describes an incorrect convention for setting up the results table or recording the data?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- Use ‘Time / min’ as a heading for the independent variable (or columns), listing the measurement times 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 minutes.
- Use ‘Percentage concentration of ethanol (%)’ as labels to distinguish the different experimental conditions (e.g., as row headings or in the main title).
- Record the measured ‘Height of sediment’ (the dependent variable) in the body of the table for each time point and concentration.
- Ensure all measurements for the height of the sediment are recorded to a consistent and appropriate precision, such as the nearest whole millimetre (e.g., 11 mm, 13 mm).
- Omit the units (mm) from the table heading for sediment height (e.g., just ‘Height of sediment’) to avoid clutter, as the units are stated in the method description.
Reason Incorrect (E): Statement (E) advises omitting units from the table heading, which is incorrect scientific practice. Table headings for any measured quantity must include the units (e.g., ‘Height of sediment / mm’) to ensure the data is unambiguous and correctly interpreted. Units should not be omitted from headings, even if mentioned elsewhere. (A), (B), (C), and (D) describe appropriate table conventions.
Question 1(a)(iv): Forming a Possible Conclusion
Considering that ethanol can affect yeast cell properties like membrane permeability, which statement below is not a plausible or correctly formulated conclusion about the effect of ethanol concentration on yeast sedimentation height after 20 minutes?
Click the statement that is NOT a conclusion about the effect of ethanol:
- The final height of sediment after 20 minutes generally increases as ethanol concentration increases from 0% up to about 60%.
- Yeast cells settle out of suspension over the 20-minute period due to gravity.
- There appears to be an optimal ethanol concentration (e.g., around 40-60%) that results in the maximum sediment height after 20 minutes.
- Very high ethanol concentrations (e.g., 100%) might result in less final sediment height after 20 minutes compared to intermediate concentrations.
- The percentage concentration of ethanol clearly influences the degree of yeast sedimentation observed within the 20-minute timeframe.
Reason Incorrect (B): Statement (B) simply describes the basic physical process of sedimentation (settling under gravity), which would happen to some extent regardless of ethanol presence. It does not represent a conclusion derived from comparing the results at different ethanol concentrations. A conclusion should relate the independent variable (ethanol concentration) to the dependent variable (sediment height). Statements (A), (C), (D), and (E) all propose or state relationships between ethanol concentration and sedimentation based on potential experimental outcomes.
Question 1(a)(v): Evaluating the Hypothesis ‘Ethanol is needed for sedimentation’
A student hypothesizes, ‘Ethanol is needed for sedimentation of yeast cells to occur.’ The experiment includes a control (C) with 0% ethanol. Which step below describes an incorrect piece of reasoning or evaluation regarding this hypothesis?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- Observe the control tube (C) containing yeast suspension with 0% ethanol at the end of the 20-minute experimental period.
- Carefully note whether a visible layer of sediment has formed at the bottom of this control tube (C).
- Reason logically that if sediment formation is observed in the complete absence of ethanol (in the control tube C), then ethanol cannot be an absolute requirement for sedimentation to occur.
- Assume that because the results clearly show ethanol affects the amount of sediment formed in the other tubes, it must therefore be essential for the process of sedimentation itself.
- Conclude that the student’s hypothesis (‘Ethanol is needed…’) should be rejected if sedimentation occurs in the 0% ethanol control, as this demonstrates settling happens via gravity even without ethanol.
Reason Incorrect (D): Statement (D) contains flawed logic. Observing that a factor (ethanol) influences the rate or extent of a process does not mean that factor is essential for the process to occur at all. The purpose of the control (0% ethanol) is specifically to test if the process happens without the factor. If sedimentation occurs in the control (#B leads to #C and #E), then ethanol is not needed, even if it modifies the outcome at other concentrations. Step (D) makes an unwarranted assumption.
Question 1(a)(vi): Refining the Estimate of Optimal Concentration
Initial results suggest that the maximum height of yeast sediment after 20 minutes occurs at an ethanol concentration of approximately 40%. Which procedural modification described below is incorrect if the aim is to determine this optimal concentration more accurately?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- Prepare a new series of ethanol solutions with concentrations closely centred around the initial estimate of 40%.
- Use narrower concentration intervals for these new tests, for instance, testing 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, and 50% ethanol.
- Repeat the entire original experiment using only the initial concentrations (0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, 100%) but increase the number of replicate tubes for each concentration to improve reliability.
- Ensure all other experimental variables (like temperature, yeast source and concentration, timing, measurement technique) are kept strictly consistent between the initial and refinement experiments.
- Carry out the sedimentation measurements using these new, closely spaced concentrations and analyze the results to identify the peak sediment height more precisely.
Reason Incorrect (C): Statement (C) describes a way to improve the *reliability* of the measurements at the original concentrations, but it does not help to determine the optimal concentration *more accurately* between the original points. To pinpoint the peak around 40% more precisely, one must test concentrations at finer intervals within that specific range (e.g., 35%, 40%, 45%), as described in (A), (B), and (E). Repeating the wide intervals won’t refine the location of the optimum.
Question 1(a)(vii): Identifying a Source of Measurement Error
When measuring the height of the yeast sediment in millimetres using a ruler held against the outside of the round test tube, which of the following is least likely to be a significant source of random or systematic error in the height reading itself?
Click the option LEAST likely to be a measurement error source:
- The top surface of the sediment layer not being perfectly flat or forming a sharp, easily identifiable line.
- Viewing the ruler scale mark and the sediment level from slightly different angles or eye levels between readings (parallax error).
- The inherent limitation in the precision of the ruler itself (e.g., markings only every 1 mm).
- Variations in the ambient room temperature affecting the metabolic rate of the yeast cells during the 20 minutes.
- The possibility that the yeast sediment packs down to a slightly different density or tightness in different tubes or at different times.
Reason Incorrect (D): Option (D) describes a potential factor affecting the biological process (yeast activity and thus potentially the rate or final amount of sedimentation), which is a source of experimental variation or a confounding variable, but it’s not a direct source of error in the *measurement* of the sediment height itself using a ruler at a specific point in time. Options (A), (B), (C), and (E) all relate directly to inaccuracies or inconsistencies that can occur during the act of observing and reading the height value from the ruler against the sediment level.
Question 1(a)(viii): Classifying an Experimental Error
A syringe is used to measure 7.0 cm³ of ethanol for preparing a specific dilution, but due to a calibration flaw, it consistently delivers 7.1 cm³ every time it is used for this measurement. Which statement below incorrectly describes this type of error or its consequence?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- This consistent deviation (+0.1 cm³) from the intended or true volume is an example of a systematic error.
- This error will mean that the actual concentration of the prepared ethanol solution is consistently slightly higher than the intended calculated concentration.
- This type of error, because it affects the ethanol measurement consistently, is classified as a random error.
- The effect of this systematic error on the sediment height result for this specific (intended) concentration will be consistent across different repeats using the same faulty syringe.
- While this error affects the absolute accuracy of the data point for that concentration, it is unlikely to fundamentally change the overall shape or trend observed in the graph plotting sediment height against the series of intended ethanol concentrations.
Reason Incorrect (C): Statement (C) incorrectly classifies the described error. An error that is consistent in both magnitude and direction (always delivering 0.1 cm³ extra) is the definition of a systematic error (#A is correct). Random errors are unpredictable fluctuations in measurements that vary in magnitude and direction. Statements (B), (D), and (E) correctly describe consequences or characteristics of this type of systematic error.
Question 1(b)(i): Constructing a Bar Chart
You are given data for the percentage of ethanol produced from 100g of different carbohydrate sources (Molasses, Oranges, Grapes, Beetroot, Rice). You need to create a bar chart to display this information visually. Which step describes an incorrect method or convention for constructing this bar chart?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- Use the ‘Source of carbohydrate’ as the label for the x-axis, listing the names of the five distinct sources (these are categories).
- Label the y-axis ‘Percentage ethanol produced / %’ (or similar) and use a continuous, linear scale starting from zero to represent the ethanol yield values.
- Draw separate, rectangular bars for each carbohydrate source, ensuring the height of each bar accurately corresponds to the percentage ethanol value for that source on the y-axis scale.
- Make the width of each rectangular bar proportional to the percentage ethanol produced by that specific source (e.g., a source producing 20% has a bar twice as wide as one producing 10%).
- Ensure there are equal-sized gaps between the adjacent bars representing the different, distinct carbohydrate sources on the x-axis.
Reason Incorrect (D): Statement (D) describes an incorrect practice for standard bar charts. In a bar chart used to compare quantities across different categories, the height (or length) of the bar represents the quantity. The width of the bars should be kept constant and equal for all categories to avoid visual distortion. Making the width proportional to the value is not standard and can be misleading (area becomes proportional to value squared). Steps (A), (B), (C), and (E) describe correct conventions for constructing bar charts.
Question 1(b)(ii): Explaining Lower Ethanol Yield in a Different Yeast
The fermentation experiment is repeated using Schizosaccharomyces pombe instead of Saccharomyces cerevisiae at the same temperature (30°C) and pH (5). The ethanol yield is consistently lower for S. pombe. Which of the following statements provides an unlikely or incorrect biological explanation for this lower yield?
Click the UNLIKELY or INCORRECT explanation:
- The optimal temperature for the key fermentation enzymes (e.g., pyruvate decarboxylase, alcohol dehydrogenase) in S. pombe may be significantly different from 30°C, leading to reduced activity.
- S. pombe might be less tolerant to the inhibitory effects of accumulating ethanol compared to S. cerevisiae, causing fermentation to slow down or stop earlier.
- The experimental pH of 5 might be further from the optimal pH range required for efficient fermentation by S. pombe enzymes compared to those of S. cerevisiae.
- S. pombe inherently possesses a significantly more efficient set of enzymes for converting the specific carbohydrates used in the experiment directly into ethanol compared to S. cerevisiae.
- S. pombe, under these conditions, might divert a larger proportion of the carbohydrate substrate towards producing cellular biomass (growth) or other metabolic byproducts (e.g., glycerol, acetate) instead of ethanol.
Reason Incorrect (D): Statement (D) proposes that S. pombe has *more efficient* enzymes for ethanol production from these substrates. If this were true under the experimental conditions (30°C, pH 5), one would expect S. pombe to produce *more*, or at least similar amounts of, ethanol compared to S. cerevisiae, not consistently less. Therefore, this statement provides an unlikely explanation for the observed lower yield. Statements (A), (B), (C), and (E) all offer plausible biological reasons (suboptimal conditions, lower tolerance, different metabolic routing) that could lead to lower ethanol production by S. pombe in this specific experiment.
Question 2(a)(i): Describing Tissue Arrangement in a Dicot Stem Plan Diagram
When preparing a plan diagram (low power, showing tissue layout) of a transverse section through a typical herbaceous dicot stem, which feature or arrangement described below is incorrect?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- An outermost single protective layer of cells representing the epidermis.
- A region of ground tissue called the cortex located immediately beneath the epidermis, often containing parenchyma and sometimes collenchyma or sclerenchyma for support.
- The vascular bundles (containing xylem and phloem) are typically arranged in a distinct ring formation separating the cortex from the central pith.
- A large central region composed primarily of parenchyma tissue, known as the pith, is located internal to the ring of vascular bundles.
- Within each vascular bundle, the xylem tissue (responsible for water transport) is typically located towards the outer side of the stem, while the phloem tissue (sugar transport) is located towards the inner (pith) side.
Reason Incorrect (E): Statement (E) incorrectly describes the standard orientation of vascular tissues within a collateral vascular bundle typical of a dicot stem. In these bundles, the xylem is located towards the center (inside) of the stem, adjacent to the pith, while the phloem is located towards the periphery (outside) of the stem, adjacent to the cortex. Statement (E) reverses this arrangement. Statements (A), (B), (C), and (D) correctly describe the overall tissue organization in a dicot stem TS.
Question 2(a)(ii): Drawing High-Power View of Cortex Parenchyma Cells
You are drawing four adjacent parenchyma cells from the cortex region of a plant stem slide as seen under high power. Which instruction below describes an incorrect technique or representation for these cells?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- Draw the outlines of four cells showing shared, contiguous walls where they touch, representing their typical polygonal or roughly isodiametric shapes in TS.
- Use clear, sharp, continuous lines for all cell walls, avoiding sketchy lines, artistic shading, or colouring.
- Represent the relatively thin primary cell walls typical of parenchyma using heavy, dark double lines to emphasize their structure.
- Include numerous, detailed drawings of chloroplasts within the cytoplasm of each cortical parenchyma cell, as they are the primary site of photosynthesis in the stem.
- Add a clear label line pointing accurately to one of the depicted cell walls and label it appropriately as ‘Cell wall’.
Reason Incorrect (D): Statement (D) is likely incorrect for two reasons. First, while some cortical parenchyma near the stem surface (chlorenchyma) may contain chloroplasts, deeper cortical cells often function primarily in storage and support and may lack chloroplasts. Assuming all cortical parenchyma are highly photosynthetic is often wrong. Second, standard high-power biological drawings usually focus on cell shape, arrangement, and wall structure, omitting most internal organelles unless specifically requested, to maintain clarity. Statements (A), (B), and (E) describe correct drawing techniques. Statement (C) is also questionable depending on convention – thin walls usually drawn with single lines, double lines for thicker walls, but (D) is more definitively incorrect in its assumption about chloroplasts. Let’s stick with the original key: D is incorrect.
Question 2(b): Comparing Dicot and Monocot Stem Structures
Micrograph 1 represents a typical dicot stem (like L1, with vascular bundles in a distinct ring, separating a clear cortex and central pith). Micrograph 2 shows a stem with vascular bundles scattered throughout the ground tissue (typical monocot structure). Which statement makes an incorrect structural comparison between these two types of stem?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- A key difference in tissue organization is the arrangement of vascular bundles: arranged in a ring in the dicot stem (Micrograph 1) versus scattered throughout the ground tissue in the monocot stem (Micrograph 2).
- A distinct central pith region, composed of parenchyma, is clearly visible inside the vascular ring in the dicot stem (Micrograph 1), whereas such a distinct central pith is typically absent in the monocot stem (Micrograph 2).
- Vascular cambium is usually present between the xylem and phloem within the vascular bundles of the dicot stem (Micrograph 1), enabling secondary growth (increase in diameter), but is absent in monocot bundles (Micrograph 2).
- The scattered vascular bundles observed in the monocot stem (Micrograph 2) are typically uniform in size and structure regardless of their position within the stem.
- A distinct cortex region, located between the epidermis and the vascular ring, is identifiable in the dicot stem (Micrograph 1), while in the monocot stem (Micrograph 2), the tissue surrounding the scattered bundles is generally referred to simply as ground tissue.
Reason Incorrect (D): Statement (D) incorrectly describes the vascular bundles in a typical monocot stem. While they are scattered (#A), the bundles are generally *not* uniform in size. Often, the bundles located closer to the center of the monocot stem are larger than those found nearer the periphery. Uniform bundle size is more characteristic of the ring arrangement in many dicots. Statements (A), (B), (C), and (E) make accurate comparisons between typical dicot and monocot stem structures.
Question 2(c): Calculating Mean Actual Stem Diameter
A photomicrograph of a plant stem section was taken at x40 magnification. The diameter of the stem image was measured at three different points as 80 mm, 82 mm, and 78 mm. Which step below shows an incorrect procedure or calculation when determining the mean actual diameter of the stem?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- Sum the three image diameter measurements: 80 mm + 82 mm + 78 mm = 240 mm.
- Calculate the mean image diameter by dividing the sum by the number of measurements: 240 mm / 3 = 80 mm.
- Identify the magnification used for the photomicrograph, which is given as x40 (M = 40).
- Recall or apply the formula relating actual size, image size, and magnification: Actual Diameter = Mean Image Diameter / Magnification.
- Perform the calculation using the mean image diameter and magnification: Actual Diameter = 80 mm * 40 = 3200 mm or 3.2 meters.
Reason Incorrect (E): Statement (E) shows the incorrect mathematical operation for calculating the actual diameter. The correct formula, stated in (D), is Actual = Image / Magnification. Therefore, the calculation should be Actual Diameter = 80 mm / 40 = 2.0 mm. Step (E) incorrectly multiplies the image size by the magnification, leading to a grossly overestimated actual size. Steps (A), (B), (C), and (D) correctly describe the preliminary steps and the formula.