< All Topics

2024 AS Practical S2

Study Notes:

Biology Practical Skills Quiz: Find the Incorrect Statement

Read each question and the statements below it. Click on the ONE statement you believe is INCORRECT. If you choose correctly, the reason why it’s wrong will appear, and you’ll earn a point.

Score: 0
Question 1 (a)(i): Protease Enzyme Investigation – Preparing Dilutions

You need to prepare 10 cm³ of an 80% protease solution starting from a 100% stock solution (P) and distilled water (W) using proportional dilution. Which step below describes an incorrect action or calculation for this specific task?

Click the INCORRECT statement:
  1. Calculate the volume of 100% stock solution (P) needed: 80% of 10 cm³ = 0.80 × 10 cm³ = 8.0 cm³.
  2. Calculate the volume of distilled water (W) needed: Total volume – Volume of P = 10 cm³ – 8.0 cm³ = 2.0 cm³.
  3. Accurately measure 8.0 cm³ of the 100% protease stock solution (P) using a measuring cylinder or pipette.
  4. Accurately measure 2.0 cm³ of the 100% protease stock solution (P) using a measuring cylinder or pipette.
  5. Combine the measured volumes of P (from step 3) and W (calculated in step 2 and measured separately) into a clean container and mix thoroughly.
Reason Incorrect (D): Step D incorrectly states to measure 2.0 cm³ of the protease stock solution (P). According to the correct calculation in Step B, the volume of distilled water (W) required is 2.0 cm³. Step C correctly identifies the volume of P needed (8.0 cm³). To make the 80% solution, you need 8.0 cm³ of P and 2.0 cm³ of W. Step D describes measuring the wrong substance for the calculated volume.
Question 1 (a)(ii): Protease Enzyme Investigation – Experimental Design and Recording

You are setting up an experiment to investigate how protease concentration affects the time it takes for 2 cm³ of milk to clot when 1 cm³ of protease solution is added. You will test concentrations of 100%, 80%, 60%, 40%, and 20%. Which step below describes an incorrect procedure for setting up the results table or recording the data?

Click the INCORRECT statement:
  1. Design a table with ‘Percentage concentration of protease (%)’ as the heading for the independent variable column.
  2. Include a column headed ‘Time taken for clots to appear / minutes (min)’ for the dependent variable.
  3. Include columns for repeat measurements (e.g., ‘Time 1 / s’, ‘Time 2 / s’) to ensure results are reliable.
  4. Decide on a maximum observation time (e.g., 180 seconds) and record results exceeding this as ‘>180 s’.
  5. Predict that the time taken for clotting will increase as the protease concentration decreases.
Reason Incorrect (B): Step B suggests recording the time in minutes (min). For enzyme reactions like milk clotting under these conditions, the times are likely to be measured in seconds for adequate precision. Recording in minutes would likely lead to less precise data (e.g., 1.5 minutes vs. 90 seconds) and potentially awkward fractions, making analysis harder. The standard unit for timing such reactions in labs is usually seconds (s), as correctly implied in Steps C and D.
Question 1 (a)(iii): Protease Enzyme Investigation – Source of Error in Observation

When visually observing the test tubes to determine the precise moment the milk begins to clot, several factors can introduce errors. Which of the following is least likely to be a significant source of error specifically related to the visual judgement of the clotting endpoint?

Click the statement LEAST likely to be an error in visual judgement:
  1. The subjective nature of deciding exactly when the very first small clots are consistently visible.
  2. Variations in interpretation between different students observing the same tube.
  3. The measuring cylinder used to measure the initial 2 cm³ of milk being slightly inaccurate.
  4. Momentary lapses in concentration by the observer leading to slight inconsistencies in endpoint determination.
  5. Subtle differences in the lighting conditions making the small clots harder or easier to see at different times.
Reason Incorrect (C): Step C describes an error in measurement (volume of milk), which is a source of experimental error affecting the reaction conditions, but it is not directly related to the difficulty or inconsistency of visually judging the clotting endpoint itself. Steps A, B, D, and E all relate directly to the challenges and potential variabilities inherent in human observation and perception when determining the exact moment clotting starts.
Question 1 (a)(iv): Protease Enzyme Investigation – Rationale for Repeating Experiments

Repeating experimental procedures multiple times (e.g., measuring the clotting time twice for each concentration) is a fundamental aspect of good scientific practice. Which statement below describes a reason that is incorrect or not a primary purpose of performing repeats?

Click the INCORRECT reason for repeats:
  1. To allow the calculation of a mean (average) value for the dependent variable at each condition.
  2. To increase the overall reliability and confidence in the experimental results by checking for consistency.
  3. To identify and potentially disregard anomalous results (outliers) that deviate significantly from other measurements under the same conditions.
  4. To ensure that the equipment being used (e.g., stopwatch, measuring cylinders) is calibrated correctly.
  5. To minimise the impact of random errors (unpredictable variations) that might affect individual measurements.
Reason Incorrect (D): Step D is incorrect as a primary reason for repeats. While inconsistent results from repeats might *suggest* an equipment issue, repeating measurements does not, in itself, ensure equipment calibration or correct systematic errors. Calibration is a separate process done beforehand. Repeats primarily help assess and reduce the impact of random errors, identify anomalies, and increase confidence in the mean value (Steps A, B, C, E). If equipment has a systematic error (e.g., consistently measures 1 second too fast), repeats will likely just reproduce that error.
Question 1 (a)(v): Protease Enzyme Investigation – Ensuring a Fair Test with an Unknown

You now want to estimate the protease concentration in an unknown fruit extract (U) using the same experimental setup where you added 1 cm³ of known protease solutions to 2 cm³ of milk. Which step below describes an incorrect action when testing the unknown extract U if you want to ensure a fair comparison?

Click the INCORRECT procedure for a fair comparison:
  1. Use the same batch of milk kept at the same temperature as used for testing the known concentrations.
  2. Carefully measure exactly 2 cm³ of milk into a clean test tube using an appropriate measuring device (e.g., syringe, pipette).
  3. Carefully measure exactly 1 cm³ of the unknown fruit extract (U) using an appropriate measuring device.
  4. Add the measured 1 cm³ of U to the 2 cm³ of milk, mix appropriately (if required), and immediately start timing the reaction.
  5. Because the concentration of enzyme in U is unknown, add 2 cm³ of U to the milk instead of 1 cm³ to ensure a reaction occurs quickly.
Reason Incorrect (E): Step E describes an incorrect procedure that violates the principle of a fair test. To compare the unknown (U) against the known standards and estimate its concentration, all experimental conditions, except the variable being tested (the protease source/concentration), must be kept identical. Since 1 cm³ of the known solutions was used, exactly 1 cm³ of the unknown solution U must also be used (as stated in Step C). Changing the volume of U invalidates the comparison with the calibration curve generated from the known concentrations. Steps A, B, C, and D describe correct procedures for maintaining controlled variables.
Question 1 (a)(vi) & (vii): Protease Enzyme Investigation – Interpreting the Unknown Result

Suppose the unknown fruit extract U took 95 seconds to clot the milk. Your previous results for known concentrations were: 100% (30s), 80% (45s), 60% (65s), 40% (85s), 20% (130s). How should you correctly interpret the result for U to estimate its protease concentration? Which step below describes an incorrect interpretation or action?

Click the INCORRECT interpretation or action:
  1. Record the clotting time measured for the unknown extract U accurately as 95 seconds.
  2. Compare the time for U (95s) to the times for the known standards and note that it falls between the time for 40% (85s) and the time for 20% (130s).
  3. Recall the established trend from the known standards: lower protease concentration results in longer clotting times (an inverse relationship).
  4. Plot a calibration graph of clotting time (y-axis) against protease concentration (x-axis) using the data points from the known standards.
  5. Estimate the concentration of U by simply calculating the arithmetic mean of the bracketing concentrations: (40% + 20%) / 2 = 30%.
Reason Incorrect (E): Step E describes an incorrect method for estimation. Simply averaging the concentrations (40% and 20%) that correspond to the times bracketing the unknown’s time (85s and 130s) ignores where the unknown’s time (95s) actually falls within that range. Since 95s is closer to 85s (40%) than to 130s (20%), the estimated concentration should be closer to 40% than to 20%. The correct method involves interpolation, either visually from a calibration graph (as suggested in Step D) or mathematically assuming a relationship (often inverse or inverse linear for rate vs concentration), but not a simple midpoint average of the concentrations. Steps A, B, C, and D are valid parts of the analysis process.
Question 1 (a)(viii): Protease Enzyme Investigation – Improving Estimation Accuracy

Having made a preliminary estimate that the protease concentration in U lies between 20% and 40%, you want to refine this estimate to be more accurate. Which of the following procedural modifications would be least effective or incorrect for achieving a more accurate estimate?

Click the LEAST effective or INCORRECT procedure:
  1. Prepare a new series of standard protease solutions with concentrations at narrower intervals specifically within the 20% to 40% range (e.g., 25%, 30%, 35%).
  2. Repeat the milk clotting experiment using these new, more closely spaced standard solutions, along with testing the unknown extract U again under identical conditions.
  3. Ensure all other experimental variables (volume of milk, temperature, volume of extract/solution added, mixing procedure) are kept strictly constant during these new measurements.
  4. Repeat the measurements for the original broad range of concentrations (100%, 80%, 60%, 40%, 20%) many more times (e.g., 10 repeats each) to improve the reliability of the initial calibration data.
  5. Compare the clotting time obtained for U (e.g., 95s) to the clotting times measured for the new, narrower range of standards (e.g., 25%, 30%, 35%) to allow for a more precise interpolation or graphical estimation.
Reason Incorrect (D): Step D describes improving the reliability of the original data points but is the least effective strategy for *refining the estimate* within the specific 20% to 40% range. To get a more accurate estimate *within* that range, you need more information *inside* that range. Preparing and testing standards at closer intervals within the 20-40% bracket (Steps A, B, E) provides the necessary data points for a more precise interpolation. While controlling variables (Step C) is always vital for accuracy, Step D focuses on improving the original wide-range data, which doesn’t directly help narrow down the estimate between 20% and 40%.
Question 1 (b)(i): Protease Enzyme Investigation – Describing pH and Enzyme Activity Relationship

The activity of the protease actinidin was measured at various pH values, yielding the following data pairs (pH, Activity in µmol min⁻¹ mg⁻¹): (1.8, 0.00), (4.0, 20.25), (5.1, 24.00), (6.1, 28.25), (7.4, 22.50), (8.5, 6.75). Which statement below incorrectly describes the relationship shown in this data?

Click the INCORRECT description of the data:
  1. At the very acidic pH of 1.8, the enzyme exhibits essentially zero measurable activity.
  2. The enzyme’s activity increases steadily and continuously as the pH rises from 1.8 all the way up to 8.5.
  3. The highest measured activity, representing the approximate optimum pH under these conditions, occurs at pH 6.1.
  4. As the pH increases beyond the optimum value (from 6.1 towards 8.5), the enzyme’s measured activity decreases significantly.
  5. The relationship between pH and enzyme activity shown by the data is characteristic of a curve with an optimal peak, rather than a linear increase or decrease.
Reason Incorrect (B): Statement B claims activity increases steadily across the entire tested pH range (1.8 to 8.5). This is incorrect based on the data. Activity increases from pH 1.8 to a peak at pH 6.1, but then decreases significantly at pH 7.4 and pH 8.5. Statements A, C, D, and E accurately reflect the trends observed in the provided data points.
Question 1 (b)(ii): Protease Enzyme Investigation – Explaining the Effect of pH on Protease Activity

Considering the protease activity data showing an optimum around pH 6.1 and much lower activity at pH 1.8 and 8.5, which statement below provides an incorrect biochemical explanation for this phenomenon?

Click the INCORRECT biochemical explanation:
  1. Extreme pH values (both highly acidic like 1.8 and highly alkaline like 8.5) can alter the ionization state (protonation/deprotonation) of acidic and basic amino acid R-groups within the protease enzyme.
  2. Changes in the charges of these R-groups can disrupt the pattern of hydrogen bonds and ionic bonds that are crucial for maintaining the enzyme’s specific three-dimensional tertiary structure.
  3. Altering the enzyme’s overall tertiary structure primarily affects its stability and solubility but does not significantly change the specific shape or chemical properties of the active site itself.
  4. A change in the active site’s conformation (shape and charge distribution) reduces its complementarity to the substrate molecule, hindering effective binding and formation of the enzyme-substrate complex.
  5. The enzyme functions most efficiently near its optimum pH (around 6.1) because at this pH, the ionization states of key amino acids maintain the active site in the most effective conformation for binding the substrate and catalyzing the reaction.
Reason Incorrect (C): Statement C is incorrect because the active site’s specific shape and chemical environment are an integral part of the enzyme’s overall tertiary structure. Changes in tertiary structure induced by non-optimal pH (altering R-group ionization and disrupting bonds, as described in A and B) directly impact the conformation and properties of the active site. This change in active site shape is precisely why substrate binding is hindered and enzyme activity decreases (as stated correctly in D and E). The active site shape is not independent of the overall tertiary structure.
Question 2 (a)(i): Xerophytic Leaf Structure – Drawing a Plan Diagram

You are preparing a plan diagram (low power, showing tissue distribution) of a transverse section of a xerophytic leaf that features infoldings on the lower surface containing vascular bundles and trichomes. Which of the following describes an incorrect technique or feature for a standard plan diagram?

Click the INCORRECT technique/feature for a plan diagram:
  1. Draw the overall outline of the leaf section accurately, showing its characteristic shape, including any rolling or significant infolding of the lower surface.
  2. Use clear, single, continuous lines to demarcate the boundaries between the major tissue regions: e.g., upper epidermis, the entire mesophyll region (without distinguishing palisade/spongy), lower epidermis lining the infoldings, and vascular bundles.
  3. Carefully draw the shapes and relative sizes of individual palisade mesophyll cells and spongy mesophyll cells within the mesophyll region to show cellular detail.
  4. Indicate the location and approximate size/shape of vascular bundles, typically shown within the protected infoldings (crypts) in this type of leaf.
  5. Represent the presence of numerous trichomes (hairs) as simple lines arising from the lower epidermis within the infoldings, without attempting to show their cellular structure.
Reason Incorrect (C): Step C describes drawing individual cells, which is incorrect for a plan diagram. Plan diagrams are low-power representations designed to show the overall distribution and arrangement of different tissues within an organ or structure, not the details of individual cells. The mesophyll region should be outlined as a distinct tissue area, but individual cells within it are not drawn. Steps A, B, D, and E correctly describe appropriate features and techniques for creating a plan diagram of this leaf structure.
Question 2 (a)(ii): Xerophytic Leaf Structure – High Power Drawing of Epidermal Cells and Trichome

You need to create a detailed, high-power drawing showing three adjacent lower epidermal cells and one associated trichome (hair) from the xerophytic leaf slide. Which step below describes an incorrect procedure or convention for this type of biological drawing?

Click the INCORRECT procedure/convention:
  1. Carefully observe under high power and accurately draw the shapes, relative sizes, and points of contact of the three adjacent lower epidermal cells and the structure of the associated trichome as observed.
  2. Use sharp, clear, continuous lines for all outlines and structures depicted; avoid the use of sketching, shading, or excessive artistic flair.
  3. Represent the relatively thick cell walls separating the adjacent epidermal cells and surrounding the trichome using distinct double lines where appropriate to indicate their thickness.
  4. Draw all visible internal organelles within the epidermal cells and the trichome cell(s), such as nuclei, chloroplasts (if present), mitochondria, ribosomes, and vacuoles, to make the drawing complete.
  5. Add a clear, straight label line using a ruler, pointing accurately to the outer boundary of the trichome structure, and label it appropriately (e.g., ‘Cell wall of trichome’).
Reason Incorrect (D): Step D suggests drawing all visible internal organelles. While high-power drawings show cellular detail, standard biological drawings often focus on specific structures or tissue organization. Unless specifically requested to show organelles, including all of them (especially small ones like ribosomes or mitochondria which might not be clearly resolved) can clutter the drawing and detract from the main features being illustrated (cell shapes, walls, trichome structure). Often, only major, clearly visible, and relevant structures (like the nucleus or chloroplasts if prominent) are included. The original source likely intended focus on cell outlines/walls. Steps A, B, C, and E represent correct conventions for high-power biological drawings.
Question 2 (a)(iii): Xerophytic Leaf Structure – Identifying Xerophytic Features

Observing the transverse section of the xerophytic leaf slide, you need to identify one structural adaptation to dry conditions other than the presence of trichomes. Which of the following features is not considered a typical xerophytic adaptation likely to be observed in such a leaf structure?

Click the feature NOT typical of xerophytes:
  1. The leaf blade being rolled inwards or having significant infoldings (crypts) on the lower surface, enclosing the stomata.
  2. A very thin and highly permeable cuticle covering the upper (adaxial) epidermis to maximise light absorption.
  3. Stomata confined to the lower epidermis and located within the protected environment of the infoldings (sunken stomata).
  4. A relatively thick epidermal layer (sometimes multiple layers) compared to typical mesophytic leaves.
  5. Possibly presence of specialised hinge cells (bulliform cells) near the midrib or margins that facilitate leaf rolling/unrolling in response to water availability (though may not always be easily identifiable).
Reason Incorrect (B): Statement B describes a thin, permeable cuticle. This is the opposite of a xerophytic adaptation. Plants adapted to dry conditions (xerophytes) typically possess a thick, waxy, impermeable cuticle to minimize water loss through transpiration directly from the epidermal surface. A thin cuticle would lead to excessive water loss. Features described in A, C, D, and E are all recognised adaptations found in various xerophytic leaves to conserve water.
Question 2 (b)(i): Xerophytic Leaf Structure – Calculating Percentage Width

On a micrograph, you measure the total width of a pair of guard cells as 40 mm (line P-Q) and the width of the stomatal pore between them as 12 mm (line R-S). You need to calculate the pore width as a percentage of the total guard cell width, expressing the answer to two significant figures. Which step below shows an incorrect part of the calculation process or result?

Click the INCORRECT step or result:
  1. Identify the value representing the ‘part’: Pore width = 12 mm.
  2. Identify the value representing the ‘whole’: Total guard cell width = 40 mm.
  3. Set up the calculation for percentage as: (Part / Whole) × 100 = (Pore width / Guard cell width) × 100.
  4. Calculate the numerical value: (12 mm / 40 mm) × 100 = 0.3 × 100 = 30.
  5. State the final answer, expressed to the required two significant figures, as 3.0%.
Reason Incorrect (E): Step E incorrectly represents the final answer when expressed to two significant figures. The calculated value is 30. To show this value to two significant figures, it should be written as 30 (implying the zero is significant) or, more unambiguously, using standard form as 3.0 x 10¹. Writing it as “3.0%” represents the value 3 per hundred, which is numerically incorrect (30 per hundred is the correct value). Steps A, B, C, and D correctly outline the identification of values and the calculation itself.
Question 2 (b)(ii): Xerophytic Leaf Structure – Comparing Leaf Surface Micrographs

You are comparing two micrographs. Micrograph 1 shows large, irregularly shaped (‘jigsaw puzzle’) epidermal cells and few, oval stomata, with visible nuclei. Micrograph 2 shows smaller, more regular epidermal cells and numerous, rounded stomata, nuclei not visible. Which statement makes an incorrect comparison based on these observations?

Click the INCORRECT comparison:
  1. Micrograph 1 displays a lower stomatal density (fewer stomata per unit area) compared to Micrograph 2, which has numerous stomata.
  2. The epidermal cells shown in Micrograph 2 are generally larger in size than those depicted in Micrograph 1.
  3. The overall shape of the stomatal pores appears more rounded or circular in Micrograph 2, whereas they appear more oval or elliptical in Micrograph 1.
  4. The outline shape of the ordinary epidermal cells is more irregular and wavy (‘jigsaw puzzle’-like) in Micrograph 1 compared to the more regular shape seen in Micrograph 2.
  5. Nuclei within the guard cells surrounding the stomata are clearly observable as distinct features in Micrograph 1 but are not visible in Micrograph 2.
Reason Incorrect (B): Statement B makes a comparison that contradicts the provided description. The description explicitly states that Micrograph 1 shows “large, irregularly shaped” epidermal cells, while Micrograph 2 shows “smaller, more regularly shaped” epidermal cells. Therefore, stating that the cells in Micrograph 2 are larger than those in Micrograph 1 is incorrect. Statements A, C, D, and E accurately reflect the observable differences mentioned in the prompt.
Table of Contents