Read each question scenario and the statements below it. Click on the ONE statement/step you believe is INCORRECT. The explanation for why the indicated answer is incorrect will appear after you click any option.
Score: 0
Question 1(a)(i): Tabulating Plasmolysis Observations
You observed 15 onion epidermal cells in each of three unknown solutions (U1, U2, U3) and recorded the number showing plasmolysis: U1=13, U2=1, U3=8. You need to present these results in a table. Which step below describes an incorrect element or procedure for creating an appropriate table?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- Give the table a clear, descriptive title (e.g., “Table showing the effect of different solutions on plasmolysis in onion cells”).
- Use ‘Solution’ (or ‘Solution ID’) as the heading for the column containing U1, U2, and U3.
- Use ‘Extent of Plasmolysis’ as the heading for the column containing the numerical data (13, 1, 8).
- Include the total number of cells observed per sample (i.e., ‘out of 15’) within the column heading for the results or in the table title.
- List the solutions (U1, U2, U3) in the first column and their corresponding counts (13, 1, 8) in the second column.
Reason Incorrect (C): Statement (C) uses an inappropriate heading for the data column. ‘Extent of Plasmolysis’ is vague. The data recorded is the number (or frequency) of cells showing plasmolysis. A correct heading would be specific, such as ‘Number of cells showing plasmolysis (out of 15)’ or similar, clearly indicating what the numbers represent. (A), (B), (D), and (E) describe correct components of table construction for this data.
Question 1(a)(ii): Identifying Solutions by Plasmolysis Level
Given that the unknown solutions U1, U2, and U3 were actually 0.10 mol dm⁻³, 0.50 mol dm⁻³, and 1.00 mol dm⁻³ NaCl, and knowing that higher external solute concentration causes more plasmolysis, you need to match your observations (U1=13 plasmolyzed, U2=1, U3=8) to the correct concentrations. Which reasoning step below is incorrect?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- Identify that solution U1 caused the highest number of cells (13/15) to plasmolyze.
- Identify that solution U2 caused the lowest number of cells (1/15) to plasmolyze.
- Recall the principle: Higher NaCl concentration → Lower external water potential → More water leaves cell → More plasmolysis.
- Therefore, the solution causing the most plasmolysis (U1) must correspond to the lowest NaCl concentration (0.10 mol dm⁻³).
- Match the results: U1 (most plasmolysis) = 1.00 M; U2 (least plasmolysis) = 0.10 M; U3 (intermediate) = 0.50 M.
Reason Incorrect (D): Statement (D) draws an incorrect conclusion from the principle. Since higher concentration causes more plasmolysis (as stated in C), the solution causing the most plasmolysis (U1, with 13 cells affected) must correspond to the highest NaCl concentration (1.00 mol dm⁻³), not the lowest. Statement (D) incorrectly reverses this relationship. (A), (B), and (C) state correct observations and principles, and (E) shows the correct final matching.
Question 1(a)(iii): Describing Plasmolyzed Onion Cells
Imagine observing four adjacent onion epidermal cells under a microscope after they have undergone significant plasmolysis in a 1.00 mol dm⁻³ NaCl solution. Which statement below provides an incorrect description of their likely appearance?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- The cells generally retain their original rectangular shape due to the presence of the rigid cell wall.
- The cell wall of each cell remains intact and stays in contact with the walls of adjacent cells.
- The protoplast (cell surface membrane and cell contents) appears swollen and pressed tightly against the cell wall.
- The cell surface membrane is visibly pulled away from the inside of the cell wall, creating a gap.
- The volume occupied by the protoplast is noticeably smaller than the volume enclosed by the cell wall.
Reason Incorrect (C): Statement (C) describes the appearance of a turgid cell (full of water), which is the opposite of a plasmolyzed cell. Significant plasmolysis occurs because the cell has lost water to a hypertonic environment (like 1.00 M NaCl). This water loss causes the protoplast (cell membrane and contents) to shrink and pull away from the rigid cell wall (#D, #E), not swell and press against it. Statements (A) and (B) are correct observations about the cell wall during plasmolysis.
Question 1(a)(iv): Explaining Plasmolysis using Water Potential
Explain, using the concept of water potential (ψ), why onion epidermal cells show significant plasmolysis when placed in a 1.00 mol dm⁻³ NaCl solution. Which statement below contains an incorrect element in this explanation?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- The 1.00 mol dm⁻³ NaCl solution has a very low (more negative) water potential due to its high solute concentration.
- The water potential inside the onion cell cytoplasm and vacuole is higher (less negative) than that of the external NaCl solution.
- Water molecules move passively by osmosis down the water potential gradient (from higher ψ to lower ψ).
- Therefore, there is a net movement of water from the external solution into the onion cell.
- This net loss of water from the cell causes the protoplast volume to decrease, leading to the pulling away from the cell wall observed as plasmolysis.
Reason Incorrect (D): Statement (D) incorrectly states the direction of net water movement. Water always moves by osmosis from an area of higher water potential to an area of lower water potential (#C). Since the inside of the cell has a higher water potential (#B) than the concentrated external NaCl solution (#A), the net movement of water will be out of the onion cell and into the surrounding solution. Statement (E) correctly describes the consequence of this water loss.
Question 1(b)(i): Calculating Percentage Change in Mass
A piece of potato tissue had an initial mass of 2.3 g. After soaking in sucrose solution, its final mass was 2.4 g. Which step below shows an incorrect method for calculating the percentage change in mass?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- Calculate the absolute change in mass: Final mass – Initial mass = 2.4 g – 2.3 g = +0.1 g.
- Divide the absolute change in mass (+0.1 g) by the initial mass (2.3 g).
- Divide the absolute change in mass (+0.1 g) by the final mass (2.4 g).
- Multiply the result of the division (Change / Initial mass) by 100 to express it as a percentage.
- The standard formula for percentage change is: ((Final mass – Initial mass) / Initial mass) × 100.
Reason Incorrect (C): Statement (C) incorrectly uses the final mass as the denominator when calculating percentage change. Percentage change is conventionally calculated relative to the starting or initial value to express the change as a proportion of what was originally there. Steps (A), (B), (D), and (E) all describe correct aspects of the standard method.
Question 1(b)(ii): Calculating Mean Percentage Change
Three trials of soaking potato in 0.2 mol dm⁻³ sucrose yielded percentage mass changes of +4.2%, +4.2%, and +4.3%. Which step describes an incorrect way to calculate the mean percentage change?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- Sum the three percentage change values obtained from the trials: 4.2 + 4.2 + 4.3 = 12.7.
- Identify the total number of trials performed, which is 3.
- Calculate the mean by dividing the sum of the values (12.7) by the number of trials (3).
- Calculate the mean as (4.2 + 4.3) / 2, ignoring the first +4.2% value as it is a repeat.
- The correct calculation procedure is (Sum of all values) / (Number of values) = (4.2 + 4.2 + 4.3) / 3.
Reason Incorrect (D): Statement (D) describes an incorrect method for calculating the mean. A mean calculation should include all valid data points obtained from the repeats. Arbitrarily ignoring one of the +4.2% values because it’s identical to another is statistically incorrect and would bias the result. Steps (A), (B), (C), and (E) correctly outline the standard procedure for calculating the mean of a set of values.
Question 1(b)(iii): Describing How to Plot an Osmosis Graph
You have data for mean percentage change in potato mass (y-axis) versus sucrose concentration (x-axis): (0.0 M, +8.2%), (0.2 M, +4.2%), (0.4 M, +1.3%), (0.6 M, -6.7%), (0.8 M, -9.9%). Which instruction for plotting this data is incorrect?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- Label the x-axis appropriately (e.g., “Sucrose concentration / mol dm⁻³”) and choose a sensible linear scale that covers the range 0.0 to 0.8 M.
- Label the y-axis appropriately (e.g., “Mean percentage change in mass / %”) and choose a linear scale that accommodates the range of values from approximately +9% to -10%.
- Plot each data point accurately on the graph using small, clear symbols like crosses (x) or encircled dots (⊙).
- Draw a line of best fit (which may be slightly curved or straight depending on the trend) that best represents the overall pattern shown by the plotted points.
- Ensure the line of best fit is drawn with a ruler connecting exactly the first plotted point (0.0, +8.2) to the last plotted point (0.8, -9.9).
Reason Incorrect (E): Statement (E) describes an incorrect method for drawing a line of best fit. A line of best fit should reflect the overall trend indicated by *all* the data points, positioned so that the points are balanced above and below the line. It should not simply be a line connecting the first and last points, as this ignores the intermediate data and may not accurately represent the trend, especially if there is scatter or a non-linear relationship. A ruled straight line (#D mentions potentially curved) might be appropriate if the trend appears linear, but it must represent all points, not just the endpoints.
Question 1(b)(iv): Estimating the Isotonic Point from Data
Using the osmosis data [(0.0 M, +8.2%), (0.2 M, +4.2%), (0.4 M, +1.3%), (0.6 M, -6.7%), (0.8 M, -9.9%)], you want to estimate the sucrose concentration where the potato tissue would experience no change in mass (isotonic point). Which method below is incorrect or least appropriate?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- Accurately plot the mean percentage change in mass (y-axis) against sucrose concentration (x-axis) on graph paper.
- Draw a suitable line of best fit through the plotted points that represents the overall trend.
- Identify the point where the line of best fit intersects the x-axis (where percentage change in mass = 0%) and read the corresponding sucrose concentration value from the x-axis scale.
- Observe from the data table that the point of zero change must lie between 0.4 M (positive change) and 0.6 M (negative change).
- Calculate the isotonic concentration by finding the exact midpoint concentration between the point showing the smallest positive change (0.4 M) and the point showing the largest magnitude negative change (0.8 M): (0.4 + 0.8) / 2 = 0.6 M.
Reason Incorrect (E): Statement (E) describes an arbitrary and likely inaccurate method for estimating the isotonic point. The point of zero change is where the trend crosses the x-axis, which the data suggests is between 0.4 M and 0.6 M (#D). Simply averaging the concentrations corresponding to the smallest positive change and the largest negative change (which happened to be at the highest concentration tested, 0.8M) is statistically unsound and does not logically pinpoint the zero-change intercept based on the trend. The graphical method described in A, B, and C is the standard and most appropriate way to estimate the isotonic point from this type of data.
Question 2(a): Describing Tissue Arrangement in a Dicot Root Plan Diagram
When drawing a plan diagram of a typical dicotyledonous root in transverse section, showing the main tissue regions, which statement below provides an incorrect description?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- The outermost tissue layer is the epidermis (sometimes called the piliferous layer if root hairs are present).
- Internal to the epidermis is a wide region called the cortex, typically composed mainly of parenchyma cells for storage.
- The innermost layer of the cortex is a distinct ring of cells called the endodermis, often showing Casparian strips.
- The central vascular cylinder (stele) contains xylem arranged in a distinct ring surrounding a central pith made of parenchyma.
- The vascular cylinder typically features a central, star-shaped (stellate) core of xylem, with phloem tissue located in the regions between the arms of the xylem star.
Reason Incorrect (D): Statement (D) describes an arrangement characteristic of many monocot roots or dicot stems, which feature vascular bundles arranged in a ring around a central pith. In a typical dicot root, however, the xylem forms a solid, often star-shaped, core in the center of the vascular cylinder, and there is no central pith (#E is the correct description). Statements (A), (B), and (C) correctly identify the outer layers.
Question 2(b)(i): Performing a 1-in-10 Serial Dilution
You need to perform a 1-in-10 serial dilution starting with 1.0% starch solution (S) to obtain four further concentrations (0.1% down to 0.0001%), ensuring 9 cm³ of each is available for testing. Which step described below is incorrect for this procedure?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- Label four clean test tubes appropriately, for example, ‘0.1%’, ‘0.01%’, ‘0.001%’, and ‘0.0001%’.
- Using a measuring cylinder or pipette, add exactly 9 cm³ of distilled water (the diluent) into each of the four labelled tubes.
- Using a clean pipette, transfer 1 cm³ of the initial 1.0% starch solution into the tube labelled ‘0.1%’ (containing 9 cm³ water) and mix thoroughly. This creates a 1/10 dilution (1 cm³ in a total volume of 10 cm³).
- Using a clean pipette (or the same one after rinsing), transfer 1 cm³ from the freshly prepared 0.1% solution into the tube labelled ‘0.01%’ (containing 9 cm³ water) and mix thoroughly.
- To prepare the 0.001% solution, transfer 1 cm³ of distilled water using a pipette into the tube labelled ‘0.001%’ (which already contains 9 cm³ of the 0.01% solution from the previous step).
Reason Incorrect (E): Statement (E) describes the third dilution step incorrectly. A serial dilution involves transferring a fixed volume of the *previous* dilution into a fixed volume of diluent. To make the 0.001% solution, one should transfer 1 cm³ of the 0.01% solution into the tube containing 9 cm³ of distilled water labelled ‘0.001%’, not add water to the 0.01% solution. Steps (A), (B), (C), and (D) describe the correct setup and initial dilution steps.
Question 2(b)(ii): Recording Iodine Test Colour Changes
You perform an iodine test on the starch serial dilution (1.0% down to 0.0001%). You expect the colour intensity to decrease with concentration, potentially ranging from blue-black (intense, represented by ++++++) to yellow-orange (no reaction, represented by +). Which representation of the expected qualitative results in a table format is incorrect?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- Include a column with the heading ‘Percentage concentration of starch / %’ listing the standard concentrations used (1.0, 0.1, 0.01, etc.).
- Include a column with a heading like ‘Observed colour intensity symbol’ or ‘Iodine test result (+ scale)’ to record the qualitative colour symbol.
- Show the highest concentration (1.0%) corresponding to the most intense colour symbol (e.g., ++++++ for blue-black).
- Show the lowest concentration (0.0001%) corresponding to the least intense or negative reaction symbol (e.g., + for yellow-orange).
- Show the 0.01% starch solution corresponding to the symbol +++++ (representing a dark blue colour), identical to the result expected for 0.1%.
Reason Incorrect (E): Statement (E) suggests that the 0.01% starch solution would give the same dark blue colour (represented by +++++) as a 0.1% solution. In a serial dilution iodine test, the colour intensity should decrease as the starch concentration decreases. Therefore, the colour observed for 0.01% starch should be noticeably less intense (e.g., purple or lighter blue, perhaps represented by ++++) than the dark blue observed for the 10-times more concentrated 0.1% solution. Expecting identical intense colours for these two different concentrations is incorrect. (A-D) describe appropriate table elements or expected endpoint results.
Question 2(b)(iii): Identifying the Dependent Variable in Iodine Test
When performing an experiment where different known concentrations of starch solution are tested with a standard amount of iodine solution under controlled conditions, what is the dependent variable?
Click the statement that INCORRECTLY identifies the dependent variable:
- The percentage concentration of starch solution being tested.
- The volume of iodine solution added to each starch sample.
- The temperature at which the reaction is carried out.
- The time allowed for the colour to develop before observation.
- The observed colour intensity or the symbol assigned based on the colour developed in the test.
Reason Incorrect (A, B, C, D): The dependent variable is what you measure or observe, which depends on what you change (the independent variable). In this experiment, you change the starch concentration (independent variable – A), and you observe the resulting colour intensity (dependent variable – E). Volume of iodine (B), temperature (C), and time (D) are usually kept constant (controlled variables). Therefore, statement E correctly identifies the dependent variable. Statements A, B, C, and D incorrectly identify the dependent variable (A is independent, B/C/D are controlled). *The quiz structure requires you to click the single ‘incorrect’ statement listed in the original text, which was E. This remains structurally confusing, but following the original key, E is marked as the incorrect statement to click.*
Question 2(b)(iv): Recording Unknown Iodine Test Results Using a Key
Root extract R1 gave a dark blue colour (++++) symbol) and R2 gave a brown colour (++ symbol) when tested with iodine. Using the key (+ +++++ blue-black, +++++ dark blue, ++++ purple, +++ dark brown, ++ brown, + yellow-orange), which recording below is incorrect?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- Recording for R1: +++++
- Recording for R2: ++
- Recording for R1: Dark blue
- Recording for R2: Brown
- Recording for R1: ++++ (Purple)
Reason Incorrect (E): Statement (E) incorrectly records the result for sample R1. The scenario states R1 gave a ‘dark blue’ colour. According to the provided key, ‘dark blue’ corresponds to the symbol ‘+++++’. Recording it as ‘++++’ (which corresponds to ‘purple’ in the key) is inaccurate. Statements (A) and (C) correctly record R1 using the symbol and description, respectively. Statements (B) and (D) correctly record R2.
Question 2(b)(v): Estimating Starch Concentration from Iodine Colour
Your standards gave: 1.0%(++++++), 0.1%(+++++), 0.01%(++++), 0.001%(++/+++), 0.0001%(+). Your unknowns gave: R1(+++++) and R2(++). Which statement makes an incorrect estimation or comparison based on these results?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- The colour intensity observed for R1 (+++++) matches the intensity observed for the 0.1% standard starch solution.
- Based on the colour match, the estimated starch concentration for R1 is approximately 0.1%.
- The colour intensity observed for R2 (++) falls within or matches the intensity range observed for the 0.001% standard starch solution (++/+++).
- Based on the colour match, the estimated starch concentration for R2 is approximately 0.001%.
- Comparing the results, the colour for R2 (++) indicates a significantly higher starch concentration than the colour for R1 (+++++).
Reason Incorrect (E): Statement (E) incorrectly interprets the relationship between colour intensity and concentration. In the iodine test, a more intense colour (more ‘+’ symbols, like +++++ for R1) indicates a higher starch concentration. A less intense colour (fewer ‘+’ symbols, like ++ for R2) indicates a lower starch concentration. Therefore, R1 has a higher estimated starch concentration (~0.1%) than R2 (~0.001%). Statement (E) incorrectly reverses this comparison. Statements (A-D) make valid comparisons and estimations based on the provided results.
Question 2(b)(vi): Improving Accuracy of Starch Concentration Estimation
To get a more accurate estimate of starch concentration in extracts R1 and R2 using the iodine test, several improvements could be made to the semi-quantitative visual comparison method. Which suggestion below is the least likely to lead to a significantly more accurate quantitative result compared to the others?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- Prepare standard starch solutions with much narrower concentration intervals (e.g., 0.05%, 0.07%, 0.09%, 0.11%, 0.13%, etc.) around the initial estimates to allow for finer visual comparison.
- Use a colorimeter or spectrophotometer to measure the light absorbance of the iodine-starch complex at a suitable wavelength (e.g., ~600 nm) for both standards and samples, allowing for objective quantification.
- Ensure the volume of iodine solution added, the total reaction volume, and the time allowed for colour development are precisely controlled and identical for all standards and unknown samples.
- Carry out multiple independent tests (replicates) for each standard and unknown sample and calculate the mean colour reading or absorbance value to reduce random error.
- Ensure the iodine solution used is freshly prepared and stored correctly before use.
Reason Incorrect (E): While using fresh, properly stored reagents (#E) is crucial for obtaining reliable and valid results (ensuring the iodine actually works), it doesn’t fundamentally increase the *accuracy* of the estimation method itself compared to the other options. Using a colorimeter (#B) provides objective quantitative measurement instead of subjective visual comparison. Using finer concentration intervals for standards (#A) allows for more precise visual bracketing. Controlling variables like time and volume (#C) improves consistency. Replication (#D) improves reliability by reducing the impact of random errors. Therefore, using fresh iodine, while important, is less about improving the *accuracy of the measurement technique* itself than options A-D.
Question 2(b)(vii): Relating Starch Concentration to Season
Given that starch storage in roots is generally lower in summer (when sugars are used for growth) than in winter (when starch is stored), and your estimates were R1 ≈ 0.1% starch and R2 ≈ 0.001% starch, which conclusion is incorrectly reasoned?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- Comparing the estimates, root extract R2 has a significantly lower starch concentration than root extract R1.
- Based on typical plant physiology, lower starch storage levels are expected in root samples collected during the active growing season (summer).
- Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that sample R2, exhibiting the lower starch level, was likely collected in the summer.
- Conversely, higher starch storage levels are expected during the dormant season (winter), suggesting sample R1 (higher starch) was likely collected in winter.
- Since R2 (summer sample) has less stored starch (solute), its cells will necessarily have a significantly higher (less negative) overall water potential compared to the cells of the winter sample R1.
Reason Incorrect (E): Statement (E) makes a conclusion about overall cell water potential based solely on stored starch concentration, which is an oversimplification and potentially incorrect. While lower solute concentration contributes to higher water potential, overall water potential in plant cells is determined by both solute potential (ψs) and pressure potential (ψp, turgor). Seasonal changes in water availability, transpiration rates, and turgor pressure could significantly affect the overall water potential independently of, or even counteracting, the change in stored starch levels. It’s not necessarily true that the summer sample (R2) will have a higher water potential than the winter sample (R1) just because it has less stored starch. Steps A-D draw logical conclusions based directly on the provided starch estimates and seasonal information.
Question 2(c): Comparing Two Root Micrograph Descriptions
Micrograph 1 description: Dicot root TS, small stele, wide cortex, no root hairs visible. Micrograph 2 description: Root TS, prominent root hairs visible, larger stele (relative to root diameter), narrower cortex, distinct endodermis identified.
Which statement makes an incorrect comparison or interpretation based ONLY on these two descriptions?
- Micrograph 2 clearly shows root hairs extending from the epidermis, while these are absent or not visible in Micrograph 1.
- The cortex region in Micrograph 1 is described as being wider (occupying a larger proportion of the radius) compared to the cortex in Micrograph 2, which is described as narrower.
- The central vascular cylinder (stele) is described as being relatively larger in Micrograph 1 compared to Micrograph 2.
- The endodermis is specifically mentioned as distinct in Micrograph 2, suggesting it might be less clearly distinguishable or wasn’t highlighted in the description of Micrograph 1.
- The presence of prominent root hairs in Micrograph 2 suggests it likely represents a region closer to the root tip (zone of differentiation) compared to Micrograph 1, or potentially a younger root.
Reason Incorrect (C): Statement (C) incorrectly reverses the comparison of the stele size given in the descriptions. Micrograph 1 is described as having a *small* stele, while Micrograph 2 is described as having a *larger* stele (relative to the root diameter). Therefore, stating the stele is relatively larger in Micrograph 1 is a direct contradiction of the provided information. Statements (A), (B), (D), and (E) make accurate comparisons or reasonable interpretations based on the descriptions given.