Read each question scenario and the statements below it. Click on the ONE statement/step you believe is INCORRECT. The explanation for why the indicated answer is incorrect will appear after you click any option.
Score: 0
Question 1: Beetroot Membrane Permeability
1(a)(i) Preparing Ethanol Dilutions
You need to prepare 20 cm³ of a 20% ethanol solution using a 50% ethanol stock solution (E) and distilled water (W). Which step below describes an incorrect action or calculation for this specific task?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- Identify the target concentration (C2 = 20%) and target volume (V2 = 20 cm³).
- Identify the stock concentration (C1 = 50%).
- Calculate the required volume of 50% stock solution (V1) using C1V1 = C2V2: V1 = (20% × 20 cm³) / 50% = 8.0 cm³.
- Calculate the required volume of distilled water (W): V2 – V1 = 20 cm³ – 8.0 cm³ = 12.0 cm³.
- Carefully measure 8.0 cm³ of distilled water (W) and 12.0 cm³ of 50% ethanol (E) and mix them thoroughly.
Reason Incorrect (E): Step (E) incorrectly states the volumes to be measured for each liquid. The calculations in steps (C) and (D) correctly determined that 8.0 cm³ of the 50% ethanol stock (E) and 12.0 cm³ of distilled water (W) are needed. Step (E) swaps these volumes, describing the measurement of 8.0 cm³ of water and 12.0 cm³ of ethanol, which would result in the wrong final concentration (specifically, (12.0 * 50%) / 20 = 30% ethanol).
1(a)(ii) & (iii) Table Setup and Expected Trend
You are investigating the effect of ethanol concentration (0% to 50%) on pigment release from 10 beetroot discs soaked for 10 minutes, assessing the colour intensity using symbols (+ to ++++++). Which statement describes an incorrect way to set up the results table or describe the expected trend?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- Set up a table with ‘Percentage concentration of ethanol (%)’ as the independent variable.
- Use ‘Intensity of colour (Symbol)’ as the heading for the dependent variable column.
- Record the results for each concentration using the qualitative symbols provided (+, ++, etc.).
- The expected trend is that as the percentage concentration of ethanol increases, the intensity of the red colour decreases.
- Predict that the 0% ethanol solution (control) will show the least colour (+) and the 50% ethanol solution will show the most intense colour (++++++).
Reason Incorrect (D): Step (D) describes an incorrect expected trend. Ethanol damages cell membranes, causing the red pigment (betalain) to leak out. Higher concentrations of ethanol generally cause more membrane damage and thus more pigment leakage. Therefore, the intensity of the red colour in the surrounding solution is expected to *increase* as the ethanol concentration increases, showing a positive correlation, not decrease. Step (E) correctly reflects this expected outcome for the lowest and highest concentrations. Steps (A), (B), and (C) correctly describe the table setup.
1(a)(iv) Explaining the Effect of Ethanol on Membranes
Explain why increasing ethanol concentration leads to greater release of red pigment from beetroot cells, referring to its effect on cell membranes. Which statement provides an incorrect part of the biochemical explanation?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- Ethanol acts as an organic solvent that physically interacts with and disrupts the lipid bilayer structure of cell membranes.
- Ethanol affects both the cell surface membrane (plasmalemma) and the membrane surrounding the vacuole (tonoplast), where the betalain pigment is stored.
- Ethanol can cause the denaturation (loss of functional three-dimensional shape) of important proteins embedded within the cell membranes, affecting their function (e.g., transport proteins).
- By dissolving membrane lipids and denaturing proteins, ethanol significantly decreases the overall permeability of the membranes, effectively trapping the pigment inside the cell.
- The increased membrane damage and disruption caused by higher ethanol concentrations compromises membrane integrity, allowing more red pigment (betalain) to leak out of the vacuole and subsequently the cell.
Reason Incorrect (D): Step (D) incorrectly states that ethanol decreases membrane permeability. Ethanol’s action as a solvent disrupting lipids (#A) and denaturing proteins (#C) fundamentally damages the membrane structure (#B, #E). This damage leads to an *increase* in membrane permeability (makes it ‘leaky’), allowing molecules like the betalain pigment, which are normally contained within the vacuole and cell, to escape.
1(a)(v) Identifying the Dependent Variable
In the experiment investigating how different concentrations of ethanol affect the release of pigment from beetroot tissue, what is the dependent variable? Which statement below incorrectly identifies a variable or its role?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- The independent variable, which is deliberately changed or selected by the investigator, is the percentage concentration of ethanol used.
- The dependent variable, which is measured or observed as the result of changing the independent variable, is the intensity of the red colour in the surrounding solution (representing pigment leakage).
- A key controlled variable (a factor kept constant) is the number and approximate size of beetroot discs used in each test tube (e.g., 10 discs of similar dimensions).
- The dependent variable is the duration for which the beetroot discs are left soaking in the ethanol solution (e.g., 10 minutes).
- A factor that must be standardised (controlled variable) is the volume of the ethanol solution used for soaking each set of discs (e.g., 10 cm³).
Reason Incorrect (D): Step (D) incorrectly identifies the soaking time as the dependent variable. In this experiment, the investigator changes the ethanol concentration (#A, independent variable) and observes the resulting colour intensity (#B, dependent variable). Factors like soaking time, number/size of discs (#C), and volume of solution (#E) must be kept constant (controlled variables) to ensure that only the ethanol concentration is influencing the measured outcome. Therefore, soaking time is a controlled variable, not the dependent variable.
1(a)(vi) Standardising a Variable
Besides ethanol concentration, soaking volume, and beetroot source, you need to standardise other factors in the beetroot permeability experiment. Which option describes a relevant variable but proposes an ineffective or inappropriate method for its standardisation?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- Variable: Temperature. Method: Place all test tubes containing the samples in a thermostatically controlled water bath set to a specific, constant temperature (e.g., 30°C) throughout the soaking period.
- Variable: Soaking time. Method: Use an accurate timer (e.g., stopwatch) to start and stop the soaking period for all samples simultaneously or ensure each soaks for precisely the same duration (e.g., exactly 10 minutes).
- Variable: Surface area of discs. Method: Use the same diameter cork borer for cutting all discs and then visually estimate the thickness to ensure all discs are roughly the same thickness.
- Variable: Temperature. Method: Ensure all test tubes are left undisturbed on the same laboratory bench, away from direct sunlight, drafts, or heat sources, for the entire duration of the experiment.
- Variable: Surface area of discs. Method: Use a specific diameter cork borer for cutting all discs and then use a ruler or digital callipers to measure and select discs of a standard thickness (e.g., all discs 2mm thick).
Reason Incorrect (C): Step (C) describes an inadequate method for standardising the surface area/volume of the beetroot discs. While using the same cork borer standardises the diameter, visually estimating thickness is highly subjective and prone to significant error. This lack of precision in thickness control would lead to uncontrolled variation in the surface area and volume of tissue exposed to the ethanol, affecting the reliability of the results. Method (E) describes a much better approach using measurement tools. Method (D) describes a less precise way to control temperature than Method (A), but visually estimating thickness (C) introduces a large potential error in a key variable.
1(a)(vii) Error Source in Visual Colour Assessment
When assessing the results of the beetroot experiment by visually comparing the redness of the solutions against standards or a scale, what is a potential source of error? Which of the following is least likely to be a significant source of error specifically related to the visual judgement of colour intensity?
Click the statement LEAST likely to be a source of error in VISUAL assessment:
- The inherent subjectivity in interpreting colour hues and intensities; different observers may rank or describe the same solution slightly differently.
- The difficulty for the human eye in accurately distinguishing between solutions that have very similar, but not identical, colour intensities, especially at the extremes of the scale.
- Using sample containers (e.g., test tubes) made of slightly different types or thicknesses of glass, which might subtly affect the perceived colour or light transmission.
- Forgetting to zero or calibrate the colorimeter properly before taking absorbance readings for each of the coloured solutions.
- Natural biological variation in the initial pigment concentration between the individual beetroot discs used, leading to real differences in leakage even at the same ethanol concentration.
Reason Incorrect (D): The question specifically asks about errors related to *visual* colour assessment. Statement (D) describes an operational error associated with using a colorimeter, which is an instrument used for *quantitative* measurement of colour intensity (absorbance). This error is irrelevant if the assessment method is purely visual comparison. Statements (A) and (B) describe limitations of human visual perception. Statement (C) describes how the container might affect visual perception. Statement (E) describes biological variation that makes accurate visual comparison harder. Therefore, the colorimeter error (D) is unrelated to visual assessment.
1(a)(viii) Modifying Experiment for Temperature Effects
How should the procedure be modified to investigate the effect of temperature (independent variable) on beetroot membrane permeability (measured by pigment leakage), rather than the effect of ethanol concentration?
Click the INCORRECT modification or action:
- Prepare multiple, identical beetroot samples (e.g., same number of discs, same size, from the same beetroot if possible).
- Prepare a single, standard soaking solution to be used for all temperature treatments (e.g., use only distilled water, or perhaps a fixed, low concentration of ethanol like 10% if investigating combined effects, but keep it constant).
- Set up thermostatically controlled water baths to maintain at least five different, constant temperatures covering a physiologically relevant range (e.g., 10°C, 20°C, 30°C, 40°C, 50°C).
- Place one beetroot sample into the standard soaking solution within each pre-equilibrated water bath for a fixed, identical soaking time (e.g., exactly 15 minutes for all temperatures).
- Adjust the soaking time for each temperature being tested, using shorter soaking times for the higher temperatures and longer soaking times for the lower temperatures, before assessing the pigment release.
Reason Incorrect (E): Step (E) describes an incorrect experimental design. To isolate and investigate the effect of temperature (the independent variable) on membrane permeability, all other factors that could influence pigment leakage must be kept constant (controlled variables). This includes the soaking time. Varying the soaking time concurrently with the temperature introduces a confounding variable, making it impossible to determine if observed differences in pigment release are due to the temperature change, the time change, or an interaction between them. The soaking time must be identical for all temperatures tested, as correctly implied in Step (D). Steps (A), (B), (C), and (D) outline appropriate modifications.
1(b)(i) Plotting Blood Pressure Data
You need to plot a graph of the difference in mean blood pressure (BP) compared to a control group (y-axis, kPa) against time after drinking beetroot juice (x-axis, minutes). The data includes time points up to 220 minutes and negative values for the BP difference (reaching -1.33 kPa). Which instruction below describes an incorrect procedure for drawing this graph?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- Label the horizontal axis (x-axis) clearly as “Time after drinking beetroot juice / minutes”.
- Label the vertical axis (y-axis) clearly as “Difference in mean blood pressure compared to control group / kPa”.
- Choose linear scales for both axes. The x-axis scale must extend from 0 to at least 220 minutes. The y-axis scale must appropriately include the range from 0.0 down to at least -1.33 kPa (e.g., starting slightly above 0 and extending below -1.4).
- Plot each data point accurately using small, neat symbols such as crosses (‘x’) or encircled dots (‘☉’).
- Draw a calculated mathematical curve of best fit (e.g., using polynomial regression) that represents the trend but may pass significantly distant from some individual data points.
Reason Incorrect (E): While mathematical curves of best fit have their place, for plotting experimental biological data points like these, the standard convention is usually to either join the points sequentially with straight ruled lines (if suggesting discrete measurements over time) or to draw a smooth curve by eye that passes *through* or very close to all the plotted points, representing the observed trend directly. Calculating and plotting a regression curve (#E) might be done for analysis but is often not the expected way to *present* the raw data trend visually on a graph in this context, as it can smooth over potentially important fluctuations or imply a specific mathematical model not necessarily justified by the biology. Therefore, suggesting a calculated curve that doesn’t necessarily go near the points is likely incorrect for standard biological graph presentation. (A-D) are correct graph conventions.
1(b)(ii) Interpolation and Calculation
Using the blood pressure data points (Time = 80 min, Difference = -0.57 kPa) and (Time = 125 min, Difference = -0.92 kPa), you need to estimate the difference in BP at 100 minutes. The control group’s mean BP at 100 minutes was 15.79 kPa. Which step describes an incorrect method for this estimation or subsequent calculation?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- Recognise that the target time (100 minutes) falls between the two given data points (80 min and 125 min), so interpolation is required.
- Estimate the value at 100 min by extrapolating the trend observed between the 0 min and 80 min data points, assuming the rate of change continued linearly.
- Assume a linear change between 80 min and 125 min. Calculate the rate of change: (-0.92 – (-0.57)) kPa / (125 – 80) min = -0.35 kPa / 45 min. Estimate the value at 100 min (20 min after 80 min): -0.57 kPa + (20/45) * (-0.35 kPa) ≈ -0.73 kPa.
- Use the interpolated difference at 100 min (e.g., approximately -0.73 kPa) and the control group’s BP at 100 min (15.79 kPa) to calculate the beetroot group’s estimated BP: Estimated BP = Control BP + Difference.
- Calculate the final estimated blood pressure for the beetroot group at 100 minutes: 15.79 kPa + (-0.73 kPa) ≈ 15.06 kPa.
Reason Incorrect (B): Step (B) describes using extrapolation (projecting a trend beyond the known data range) based on an earlier segment of the data (0-80 min). Since the target time (100 min) lies *between* two known data points (80 min and 125 min) (#A is correct), the appropriate method is interpolation (estimating a value *within* the range of known data), typically assuming a linear trend between the bracketing points (#C describes this). Extrapolating from an earlier phase is unreliable as the rate of change might have altered. Steps (C), (D), and (E) correctly outline the process of linear interpolation and calculating the final result.
Question 2: Plant Leaf Structure
2(a)(i) Plan Diagram of a Dicot Leaf
When drawing a plan diagram showing the distribution of tissues in a transverse section of a typical dicot leaf lamina, which feature or instruction below is incorrect?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- Represent the upper epidermis and lower epidermis as single, continuous lines forming the top and bottom boundaries of the section.
- Show the palisade mesophyll tissue as a distinct region containing clearly drawn, individual, elongated cells packed tightly below the upper epidermis.
- Indicate the spongy mesophyll tissue region located below the palisade layer, potentially showing some unshaded areas within its outline to represent intercellular air spaces.
- Draw outlines representing several vascular bundles (veins), containing xylem and phloem, embedded within the mesophyll layers, showing their position and relative size.
- Ensure that no individual cells are drawn within any tissue region; tissues should be represented solely by outlined areas with appropriate labels identifying the tissue type.
Reason Incorrect (B): Step (B) incorrectly instructs to draw individual cell shapes (“elongated cells packed tightly”) within the palisade region of a *plan diagram*. Plan diagrams are low-power representations showing the overall distribution and arrangement of *tissues*, not the details of individual cells. While palisade tissue is indeed composed of such cells, the plan diagram should only delineate the *region* occupied by this tissue, without drawing the cells themselves. Step (E) correctly states the principle of not drawing individual cells in a plan diagram. Steps (A), (C), and (D) correctly describe how to represent other features.
2(a)(ii) High Power Drawing of a Stoma
You are making a high-power drawing of two guard cells forming a stoma, along with two adjacent lower epidermal cells from a dicot leaf transverse section or peel. Which instruction describes an incorrect representation or technique for a standard biological drawing?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- Draw the two guard cells accurately showing their characteristic kidney or bean shape, positioned to enclose the central stomatal pore.
- Draw the two adjacent epidermal cells accurately, typically showing them with irregular, interlocking shapes, like pieces of a jigsaw puzzle.
- Use sharp, clear, continuous single lines to represent the cell walls separating the guard cells from each other, the guard cells from the epidermal cells, and the outer boundary of the epidermal cells.
- Ensure the adjacent epidermal pavement cells are generally drawn larger in size than the specialized guard cells.
- Add a clear label line, drawn with a ruler and not crossing other label lines, pointing accurately to the wall of one of the guard cells, with the label ‘Cell wall’ written horizontally.
Reason Incorrect (C): Standard biological drawing conventions for high-power views of plant cells require the cell wall, a distinct and relatively thick structure, to be represented by *two* parallel lines (double lines), indicating its thickness. Using single lines (#C) is typically reserved for representing membranes (like the cell surface membrane if internal details were shown) or is used in lower-power plan diagrams where individual cell walls aren’t the focus. Steps (A), (B), (D), and (E) describe correct representations and labelling techniques for this type of drawing.
2(b)(i) Identifying Structural Differences Between Leaf Sections
You are comparing Micrograph 1 (representing slide N1, assumed to be a typical mesophytic dicot leaf) with Micrograph 2 (Fig. 2.1, showing structural variations potentially related to adaptation) to identify three observable structural differences in transverse view. Which of the following comparisons is least useful or irrelevant for identifying inherent structural differences between the two leaf sections themselves?
Click the comparison LEAST relevant to structural difference:
- Comparing the differentiation and relative thickness of palisade versus spongy mesophyll layers (e.g., clear distinction vs. less differentiated isobilateral).
- Comparing the location (e.g., embedded vs. near surface), size, and structure (e.g., bundle sheath presence) of the vascular bundles (veins).
- Comparing the specific colour (e.g., pink vs. blue) imparted by the histological stains used in preparing each slide.
- Comparing the thickness of the epidermal layers (upper and lower) or the thickness and prominence of the cuticle covering the epidermis.
- Comparing the overall shape or cross-sectional profile of the leaf section (e.g., flat vs. curved, presence of grooves or ridges).
Reason Incorrect (C): Statement (C) focuses on the colour of the stains used. While stains are essential for visualizing tissues, the specific colour choice (pink, blue, purple, etc.) is an artifact of the preparation technique and does not represent an intrinsic structural difference between the biological specimens themselves. Comparisons described in (A), (B), (D), and (E) all relate to observable differences in the actual anatomy, morphology, or tissue organization of the leaves being compared.
2(b)(ii) Calculating Actual Leaf Thickness from Scale Bar
A photomicrograph shows a leaf section (Fig. 2.1). A scale bar printed on the image is labeled ‘100 µm’ and measures 20 mm long when measured with a ruler on the image. A line A-B drawn across the leaf’s thickness on the same image measures 80 mm long with the ruler. Which step below shows an incorrect calculation or value used in determining the actual thickness A-B?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- Measurement on Image: Length of the scale bar = 20 mm.
- Actual Length represented by the scale bar = 100 µm.
- Measurement on Image: Length of the feature A-B (leaf thickness) = 80 mm.
- Calculate Ratio: Feature image length / Scale bar image length = 80 mm / 20 mm = 4. (The feature A-B is 4 times longer on the image than the scale bar).
- Calculate Actual Thickness = Ratio × Image length of scale bar = 4 × 20 mm = 80 mm.
Reason Incorrect (E): Step (E) incorrectly calculates the actual thickness. The ratio calculated in Step (D) tells us that the image of the leaf thickness (A-B) is 4 times larger than the image of the scale bar. Since the scale bar represents an actual length of 100 µm (#B), the actual thickness of the leaf (A-B) must be 4 times this actual length. Correct calculation: Actual Thickness = Ratio × Actual length represented by scale bar = 4 × 100 µm = 400 µm. Step (E) wrongly multiplies the ratio by the *image* length of the scale bar.
2(b)(iii) Calculating Magnification
Using the image measurement for leaf thickness (line A-B = 80 mm) and the correctly calculated actual thickness (400 µm from Q2bii), calculate the magnification of the photomicrograph, giving the answer to two significant figures. Which step describes an incorrect procedure or result?
Click the INCORRECT statement/step:
- Recall or state the formula for magnification: Magnification = Image size / Actual size.
- Convert Image size and Actual size to the same units before division. E.g., Image size = 80 mm = 80,000 µm; Actual size = 400 µm.
- Substitute the values (in consistent units) into the formula: Magnification = 80,000 µm / 400 µm.
- Perform the calculation: Magnification = 80,000 / 400 = 200.
- Express the answer to the required two significant figures as x20.
Reason Incorrect (E): Step (E) incorrectly rounds or represents the calculated magnification (200) when asked for two significant figures. The number 200 has potentially ambiguous significant figures (could be 1, 2, or 3 depending on context). To represent it unambiguously with *two* significant figures, it should be written in standard scientific notation as 2.0 × 10² or potentially as 200. (with a decimal point). Simply writing ‘x20’ changes the value entirely and is an incorrect representation. Steps (A), (B), (C), and (D) correctly outline the method and calculation.